1. Here's the latest cover of "Glamour," starring Kate Hudson and her strategically positioned arm.
![[imagetag]](http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/3/6/13/enhanced-buzz-29479-1362594210-3.jpg)
Source: glamour.com
Given that fashion magazines are supposed to sell us clothes — which one would think would require dressing cover models in more than jeans and pearls on chains — what gives?
3. The recent Marc Jacobs show hints at a burgeoning topless conspiracy.
![[imagetag]](http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/3/6/13/enhanced-buzz-10125-1362595804-4.jpg)
Image by Keith Bedford / Reuters
— a push for women to ditch real clothes in favor of wildly expensive accessories that sell better and account for the bulk of luxury brands' revenue. Will they laugh at us when the trend catches on, and women everywhere just give up on legit shirts?
Marc Jacobs sort of took the trend with him to Paris for his Louis Vuitton show.
5. Where this model only got to wear a bra.
![[imagetag]](http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/3/6/14/enhanced-buzz-18797-1362597898-8.jpg)
Image by Pascal Le Segretain / Getty Images
6. And Kate Moss pretty much just wore embroidery.
![[imagetag]](http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr01/2013/3/6/14/enhanced-buzz-18281-1362597863-3.jpg)
Image by Pascal Le Segretain / Getty Images
7. So maybe the "no shirt" look is really a new thing.
![[imagetag]](http://s3-ec.buzzfed.com/static/enhanced/webdr03/2013/3/6/14/anigif_enhanced-buzz-12461-1362599283-6.gif)
See more Kate Hudson on Glamour.com.
Visit the source: http://www.buzzfeed.com/amyodell/kate-hudsons-topless-glamour-cover-hints-at-fashion-world-co
Article author: amyodell
No comments:
Post a Comment